Townhouses in Parque Andrómeda, Pilar de La Horadada

Parque Andrómeda is a small-capacity launch in Pilar de La Horadada with 2 active units: one townhouse and one semi-detached home. That makes this a two-option decision inside a clear numerical range, not a broad portfolio where one can browse by preference alone. Both units are framed by 3-4 bedrooms, 2-3 bathrooms, and 107-114 m². The live availability price block is the source of truth for current pricing, so the selection starts with size and unit profile before wider district comparison.

In Costa Blanca South, practical location is read through distance and route, not just distance alone. The nearest beach marker is Playa de la Torre Derribada at 1.8 km. With this distance and a listed walking/driving profile, this is a location profile where beach access is available for planned visits rather than immediate on-demand walking every day. That framing helps clarify who should consider this launch: buyers with a service-led routine who can accept a short scheduled beach trip and want a broader town-day life rhythm.

The local services network is unusually practical for this size. Supeco is 322 m from the project, the nearest pharmacy is at 1.8 km, Centro de Salud is 922 m, and the nearest bus stop is 401 m. A park is also only 147 m away, while two supermarkets are within 1 km. This gives a routine backbone for groceries, health errands, and transport preparation, which is important in a development where beach proximity is a moderate rather than immediate factor.

Pricing still needs discipline, but current figures should be read from the live block rather than fixed prose. The input context places the average unit below the nearby area benchmark, which is not a blanket discount argument; it is a sign to compare layout and utility before moving toward booking decisions. The unit count is small, the completion target is Q4 2026, and energy performance is published as B/B for both consumption and emissions, so this is a profile where practical planning quality matters as much as commercial positioning.

The two releases sit next to a mixed comparator pool in Pilar de La Horadada, including Lo Monte, Pueblo and Barrio Los Segundas. For this development, that means contrast is not abstract: the Parque Andrómeda stock is compact and mixed-format, giving you fewer variables than a large launch but requiring clearer unit-level checks. Townhouses and semi-detached in this micro-scope are useful because the differences are in habit, not headlines.

In short, this development is a structured shortlist for buyers who value route clarity, quantified access, and a fixed completion target. Buyers who depend on immediate beachfront living should validate that tolerance first; buyers who value a predictable timeline and everyday infrastructure may find this project naturally aligned to their use case before reservation.

The layout structure is the core filter on Parque Andrómeda because unit count is low and format is split. A townhouse and a semi-detached home each carry the same bedroom and size bands, but they typically serve different daily rhythms. In compact homes, 107-114 m² and 3-4 bedrooms mean room sequence, circulation, and storage become the real selection logic. If storage and guest flow are not planned for first, a larger bedroom count can still feel constrained.

Practical ownership checks should begin with day-to-day entry and movement. Two to three bathrooms reduce pressure in short-stay periods, but circulation and access still govern whether the home feels comfortable over a season. In this stock, buyers should test the transition from entry to kitchen, bedroom depth, and storage position before trusting the headline space figures, because a 2 m² error in storage logic can change long-term usability much more than a style detail.

The feature set supports this comparison. A semi-private swimming pool, garden, and solarium are all listed in the input profile, while private parking is marked as part of the release rhythm. The useful decision task is not whether these look desirable in brochure form; it is how they sit with routines: who uses the pool, who uses the garden, when shared areas are managed, and what maintenance frequency is acceptable for your planned use.

Because completion is listed for Q4 2026 and the project is not key-ready today, planning quality is a timeline skill as much as a floorplan skill. Use the lead-up to delivery to validate room measurements, storage fit, finish scope, and access logistics rather than assuming an exact ownership pattern before one can verify specifications. In a launch of this size, this is the only reliable way to preserve comparability and avoid over-reliance on first impressions.

For buyers comparing the two formats, a clean approach is to build two scenario tests: one that assumes owner occupation and one that assumes occasional rental use. In both, the same checklist applies: layout flow, service access, beach travel pattern, and maintenance model. If one unit passes the same routine test better than the other, the decision is usually clear.

This is a practical match for buyers who want a compact stock and are prepared to assess two specific formats rather than choose from dozens of options. The profile is especially relevant for owners who can plan a Costa Blanca routine with short drives and regular trip slots, and who want a known Q4 2026 completion structure to align financing and legal preparation. With 3-4 bedrooms, 2 active units and 107-114 m², this development favors disciplined comparison between townhouse and semi-detached occupancy rather than impulsive, marketing-led comparisons.

It is also suitable for international buyers who prioritise service proximity over immediate walking beach lifestyle. Centro de Salud, Supeco, and transport access are materially close enough to keep errands practical, while RMU at 35 minutes supports predictable travel windows around visits. Buyers who already use planned ownership routines may find this page easiest to evaluate. Buyers who require instant beach adjacency or a broad active unit mix should compare alternatives before moving forward.

Rental may be a side consideration here, but only after owner-use fit is clear. Holiday use planning needs a service-first logic: licence path, community rules, management and cleaning overhead, and maintenance on pool and exterior areas should be checked before any seasonal yield target is discussed. In this size of project, a realistic rental case starts with local use discipline and cost control, not with hypothetical occupancy assumptions.